OSWALD IN THE DOORWAY- the blog of the Oswald Innocence Campaign by Ralph Cinque
www.oswald-innocent.com
Since it is almost November 22, 2023, the 60th anniversary of the assassination of JFK, I am going to review the current state of knowledge about what happened. I won’t address everything, as I am not an expert on everything. But, I will address the most important thing, which is that Lee Harvey Oswald was innocent, that he was standing in the doorway of the Texas Book Depository at the time of the shots. We have a photograph of him there which proves it, conclusively.
The physical traits of a human being are determined by the random mixing of the genes of his or her four grandparents. That is the reason why brothers, born of the same two parents, are not identical. They aren’t even close to being identical. You can distinguish brothers as easily as you can unrelated strangers. Even though they may look alike, to some extent, it’s not an issue because the threshold to distinguish them, as individuals, is greatly exceeded. That’s how individual each person is, save for identical twins, and it is determined by the genetic lottery I just described.Now, I realize that we’ve all heard of famous people who have had body doubles. Saddam Hussein had several. Did you know that they underwent surgeries to acquire the likeness to him? And there is the use of stunt doubles in Hollywood, but there, it relies heavily on getting the hair to match, the eyebrows, of course the heavy use of makeup. So, to a great extent, it is an illusion.
When we look at the resemblance between Oswald and Doorman, the match is striking.
That’s impressive, even though an intense effort was made to alter Doorman’s image to deceive the public about his identity. A photo-altering team was sent to Dallas, which I believe was organized by Dino Brugioni, the head of the CIA’s National Photographic Interpretation Center. They did their nefarious work at the CIA-connected Jaggars/Chiles/Stovall photo lab in Dallas, where, ironically, Oswald worked for 6 months from October 1962 to April 1963. What Dino’s team did, among other things, was replace the top of Doorman’s head with that of another TSBD employee, Billy Lovelady.
The image in the upper right corner of Billy Lovelady was used. They took the top of his head and put it over Doorman, thereby replacing all of Oswald’s head hair and the top of his head. But, what confirms with certainty that Doorman was Oswald is their identical clothing. The world of men is big, but so is the world of clothes. Every man is an individual, and every one of them can wear any outfit of clothes. In this case, the two men above are wearing the exact same clothes. Let’s start with Oswald, on the left. Notice how unusual his shirt was. It looks nothing like a standard American shirt. It looks more like a light jacket. Notice on his left side, which is central to us, that the “shirt” is folded over down the length of it. It looks like the lapel of a jacket. Do your shirts do that? I can tell you that they don’t. And because it’s folded over, it’s a double layer of material. You can see how much thicker the left side of his shirt looks than his right side, and I am using those terms from his perspective, not ours. So, on his right, our left, the margin of his shirt looks thin and sharp, and on his left, our right, the margin of his shirt looks thick and blunt and not so sharp, since it’s folded over.Now, if you look at the Doorman, you’ll see the exact same thing. The margin on his right, our left, looks sharp and thin, and the other side looks thick and blunt and more padded, and that’s because it was folded over the exact same way.
Now, look at the shape of the opening of their t-shirts. Both have a v shape. You see that it looks sunken into a v, yes? That t-shirt didn’t come that way. Oswald had the habit of stretching and deforming the collars of his t-shirts. However, the visibility of this homemade v fluctuated. If his t-shirt was tucked in a lot in front, it pulled the t-shirt down and stretched the v, making it more prominent. But, if his t-shirt was tucked in a lot in back, that made it rise higher in front, making the v less noticeable. But, we do have multiple images of him in which the v is apparent. So, the extent of the v fluctuated, but it was always there to some degree. The collar of the t-shirt always looked stretched and deformed because it was.
But, returning to the preceding collage:
Look at the right collar of Oswald’s shirt, that is, the collar and the little furl beneath it. It’s the exact same on Doorman. Notice that both shirts are unbuttoned. That was not a matter of choice or coincidence. It’s the same shirt, Oswald’s, and his buttons were missing. It was a very old shirt, one that he acquired in Russia, and he was living alone. He didn’t have a wife to sew his buttons on.
Now, notice how tattered Oswald’s shirt looked at the bottom left. You can see that the material of the shirt is shredding. It’s disintegrating. It’s coming apart. What about Doorman? We can’t tell because of the face of the black man beneath him, which is another phony image. That was an image taken by Congressman Phil Willis about 3:00 that afternoon. It’s on the left below.
So, the image on the left was Phil’s original photo, and they inserted just the face into the Altgens photo. You can’t assume that both James Altgens and Phil Willis captured the same image because they shot from completely different angles. It’s the same image.The black man’s name was Carl Jones. So, why did they install his image in the Altgens photo? They did it to cover up the tattered, torn bottom of Oswald’s shirt, and they had another reason: to cover up the fact that Oswald was clasping his hands in front of his body, left over right, as he stood in the doorway. It was a deeply ingrained habitof his,, and he did it repeatedly that weekend.
On the right above, you see how Oswald clasped his hands prior to the first lineup. He did the exact same thing in the doorway. But, they couldn’t let us see that. Billy Lovelady never stood that way. He posed once, for the FBI, with his hands clasped BEHIND his back, but never in front, like we see above.And speaking of Billy Lovelady, the only reliable image we have of him is the one taken by Mark Lane, which is on the left below.
The real Billy Lovelady on the left had protruding ears, otherwise known as prominent ears, otherwise known as Dumbo ears. Up to 3% of Americans have them, and Billy was among them. Oswald did not have protruding ears, and neither did Doorman. Their right ears, center and right, are identical.But, what clinches it that Oswald was Doorman is the simple fact that both the man and the clothing match.
The matching clothing confirms the match of the man and makes it ironclad absolute that Lee Harvey Oswald was the Doorway Man in in the Altgens photo. .It means that Oswald was innocent, and that terrible crimes were committed to falsify evidence and obstruct justice. And those crimes were committed by agents of the U.S. government. It’s a sickening fact, I know, but, nevertheless, true.
When it comes to who killed Kennedy, the answer is: the United States government. It was a covert operation of the intelligence agencies (CIA and FBI), Vice President Lyndon Johnson, and the U.S. Military. Obviously, the whole government wasn’t involved. However, as soon it happened, because Lyndon Johnson instantly became President, the entire government instantly became a bulwark in support of the official story that Oswald did it, and did it alone.
That narrative instantly became the litmus test for patriotism and loyalty to the U.S. government. So, even though the whole government wasn’t involved in killing Kennedy, the whole government was involved in implementing the official story into the national culture, consciousness, and record.
So, you might say that a relatively small group of men were involved in killing Kennedy, but millions were involved in covering it up, and deceiving the American people. And not just the American people, but people the world over. I’m sure there were plenty of people- in government and in media who brandished the official story and embraced it in their own minds, choosing to believe it out of self-interest, as well as out of the conviction that the relatively sanguine story of a lone nut doing it was a relief. It meant that nothing was wrong in the apparatus of the U.S. government. The system wasn’t bad, and one solitary lone nut could not undermine the inherent goodness of America and its institutions. Kennedy was gone, but all was well within the ship of state. That was the message of the official story, and Americans, in and out of government, chose to believe it. And if you worked for the government- at any level or capacity, or even if you worked for a big corporation, you were expected to believe that and support it. Patriotism and loyalty to the government have always cut to the heart of corporate culture in America. Thus, most Americans cooperated. There were a few who didn’t, but the vast majority did. Foreigners, however, were not so easily convinced. Foreigners have always been more skeptical and remain so to this day.
Yet, despite more than half a century of lies, propaganda, and mental manipulation (such as conducting surveys in which they ask people whether they think Oswald acted alone or within a conspiracy- as if there is no chance that he was innocent) there is still an eerie feeling among Americans that the official story of the JFK assassination is a lie. The concerted effort, by state and media, to eradicate JFK skepticism has been a failure. In fact, if anything, that skepticism is growing. Americans are catching up with the rest of the world who doubt the veracity of the official story of the JFK assassination.
So, how is it going to end? I can tell you. It is going to end with the complete unraveling of the official story, including the exoneration of Oswald, and the incrimination of Johnson, Dulles, Hoover, and others who were directly involved. But, I can’t tell you when it will happen. The Bolsheviks murdered the Romanov family in 1918, and the Soviet government lied about it for 73 years. Relentlessly, they tried to suppress it. You could be sent to the gulag just for suggesting it. But, as soon as the USSR fell in 1991, the lie died. A cabal within the U.S. government, which took over the U.S. government, murdered John Kennedy, and their lies about it, which became institutionalized, are going to die too. Of that I am certain.