The Shocking Truth Behind the Martin Luther King Jr. National Holiday
Martin Luther King Jr. was a moral degenerate and communist whose role was to supplant our God-given individual rights with government-granted group privileges, which we call civil rights.
“Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!” Isaiah 5:2
The governments of the world rule upon the principle of disinformation. This is illustrated by an episode that took place in 1983, when New Hampshire Governor Meldrim Thomson Jr. wrote to President Ronald Reagan objecting to the planned national holiday for Martin Luther King Jr. Thomson pointed out the evidence of King’s “immoral character” and his affiliation with communists. Ronald Reagan’s response to Thomson gives insight into the effect of disinformation on the masses and how it frames the laws and policies of government. On October 3, 1983, President Reagan responded to Thomson: “On the national holiday you mentioned, I have the reservations you have, but here the perception of too many people is based on an image, not reality. Indeed to them, the perception is reality.”1
It did not matter to Reagan what the truth was, it was the perception that was important when it came to making political decisions. The masses of people had been deceived into believing that Martin Luther King Jr. was a selfless champion of civil rights for all. The truth that King was a tool of the communists to push for special government-granted group privileges as a means to supplant individual God-given rights was known only by a few.
Because of the effectiveness of the disinformation campaign that propped up Martin Luther King Jr. as a paragon of virtue, the government was in the clear in acting to honor a plagiarizing, womanizing, communist shill.2 Ralph Abernathy, who King called “the best friend I have in the world,” documented in his autobiography, And the Walls Came Tumbling Down, that Martin Luther King Jr. was an immoral charlatan. King was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. Dr. Jimmy T. (Gunny) LaBaume reveals that Martin Luther King Jr. was a heathen who was playing the role of a Christian minister.
King, the charismatic speaker, does not seem to be the committed Christian he professed to be. In fact, he said that the Bible was filled with “legends and myths” and denied that Christ was physically raised from the dead. As a seminary student King was not at all enthusiastic about Christianity. Carl Rowan wrote in Reader’s Digest (September 1967) that “the thinking of Gandhi and Thoreau was … burning inside King”3
The King family is in on the charade. King’s wife, Coretta Scott King, knowing full well that her husband was a charlatan, marched into federal court, and on Jan. 31, 1977, “obtained a federal court order sealing 845 pages of FBI records about her husband for 50 years, ‘because its release would destroy his reputation!’ This federal judge sealed the files until the year 2027.”4 Indeed, many of the sealed documents have been characterized as “obscene.” Most of Martin Luther King Jr.’s Boston University doctoral dissertation has been proven to be plagiarized. Plagiarization seems to have been a family value in the King household. Corretta Scott King, who acted as Martin Luther King Jr.’s secretary at the time Martin Luther King Jr. put together his dissertation, was an accomplice in the plagiarization. Dr. LaBaume reveals that Martin Luther King Jr. simply could not help himself. King was a serial plagiarizer.
[O]ver his life, most of his papers, speeches, and ‘sermons’ were copied word for word from Dr. Jack Boozer, Edgar S. Brightman, and Paul Tillich. As a matter of fact, he lifted whole sections of his famous “I Have a Dream” speech from a sermon by Archibald Carey, a popular black preacher in the 1950’s.5
Martin Luther King Jr. routinely embezzled Southern Leadership Conference (SLC) money to pay for prostitutes. King was a moral degenerate, whose role was to implement the tried and true communist method of secretly agitating violence, while at the same time preaching non-violence. He thus appeared to be the victim of the very violence he planned ahead of time. Martin Luther King Jr. was a communist revolutionary. According to King’s biographer and sympathizer David J. Garrow, “King privately described himself as a Marxist.”6 In his 1981 book, The FBI and Martin Luther King, Jr., Garrow quotes King as saying in SCLC staff meetings, “we have moved into a new era, which must be an era of revolution…. The whole structure of American life must be changed…. We are engaged in the class struggle.”7 Dr. Don Boys, who is a former member of the Indiana House of Representatives and has authored 15 books, explains that “those words [of King] are right out the Communist handbook.”8 Dr. Boys further states: “Need I remind you that it was illegal to be a Communist in those days? The Communist Party was dedicated to overthrow our Constitution and way of life.”9 Dr. Boys reveals little known inside information from Uriah Fields, who was Martin Luther King Jr.’s secretary early on in King’s communist agitation.
The Rev. Uriah J. Fields, King’s secretary during the early stage of the Montgomery Bus Boycott, wrote in the March 1968 issue of American Challenger: “King helps to advance Communism. He is surrounded with communists. This is a major reason why I severed my relationship with him during the fifties. He is soft on Communism. I don’t believe that he is a Communist or a Christian, for that matter.” There is no doubt that King was not a Christian, and he was not a “card-carrying” Communist because Communists stopped carrying cards many years before that time. The question is not whether King belonged to the Communist Party, U.S.A. but was he a Communist?10
The circumstantial evidence certainly suggests that Martin Luther King Jr. was a communist. Jewish Communist Stanley Levison can best be described as King’s behind-the-scenes “handler.” Levison had for years been in charge of the secret Soviet funding of the Communist Party, USA. Levison was King’s mentor and was actually the brains behind King. It was Levison who edited King’s book, Stride Toward Freedom.11 Levison controlled the fund-raising and agitation activities of the SCLC from behind the scenes. Levison wrote many of King’s speeches. King described Levison as one of his “closest friends.”12
Dr. Boys further reveals that Julia Brown, who worked undercover in the communist party on behalf of the FBI, testified before the U.S. Congress about Martin Luther King Jr.’s communist ties.
While King may not have been an official member of the Communist Party, he was certainly supported by them because he supported their cause! Julia Brown was an undercover agent for the FBI in the Cleveland, Ohio area. She told a Congressional sub-committee that while she was a member of the Communist Party, “she knew Martin Luther King to be closely connected with the Communist Party.” On the lecture circuit, she told audiences that King “was the hero of America’s Communists. The cells that I was associated with in Cleveland were continually being asked to raise funds for Martin Luther King’s activities.” She also said, “Mr. King was one of the worst enemies my people ever had.” Oh, by the way, Julia was black! How about a holiday for a real black hero? In June of 1979 she testified at a Senate Judiciary Committee and concluded her statement to the Committee: “If this measure is passed honoring Martin Luther King, we may as well take down the stars and stripes that flies over this building and replace it with a red flag.”13
Despite Brown’s testimony, Congress nonetheless voted to approve the national holiday for Martin Luther King Jr. four years later. Reagan signed the bill into law. Reagan knew all of the above information about Martin Luther King Jr., and even more, but he did not care. He was in on the game. He, like Martin Luther King Jr., was also a charlatan. He was a socialist actor simply playing the role of a conservative politician. The statement of George H. W. Bush to Sarah McLendon could as easily have applied to Ronald Reagan. Bush told Sarah McLendon in 1992: “Sarah, if the American people ever find out what we have done, they would chase us down the street and lynch us.”
A conquering force, upon taking control of a country, will always change the national landmarks. Such changes in national landmarks are also a sign of a covert political takeover. One of the first things that communists do when taking over a country is to rewrite the history of the nation so that the people are left without a national heritage. In accomplishing that, national heroes are excised from the history books, or their patriotic deeds are distorted to fit communist ideology. The communists then elevate its killers and criminals as the new heroes.14 These new communist heroes are then celebrated with monuments and national holidays. That is what has been done in the case of Martin Luther King Jr.15 He is a communist saint who is idolized in the United States with a national holiday. Streets, schools, and federal buildings all over the country have been named in his honor. Indeed, much to the confusion of the local citizens, many long-established streets have been renamed in honor of Martin Luther King Jr.
Martin Luther King Jr. Federal Building, Atlanta, Georgia
While the Martin Luther King Jr. national holiday is largely symbolic, its symbolism acts to reinforce in the minds of the general population the need for the government to pass laws and use its force to grant privileges to a favored group. The result of the new laws is an erosion of the individual liberties of all. It is this method that has given rise to the government privilege of women to kill their children through abortion to supplant the unborn child’s God-given right to life. It can also be seen with the special government privileges granted to sodomites. Those special group privileges of the sodomites will be used as a lever to supplant the God-given individual rights of Christians.
One recent example of using government privileges to trample the God-given rights of the American people is the case of a Christian couple, Aaron and Melissa Klein mentioned in this book’s introduction. As you recall, the Kleins were forced to shut down their bakery after they were ordered to pay $135,000 in damages by the Oregon Bureau of Labor and Industry (BOLI) for refusing to bake a cake for a lesbian wedding because of their sincerely held religious belief that sodomy is a sin.16 Todd Starnes of Fox News and Commentary explains that “the Klein case has demonstrated once again that gay rights trump religious liberty. Other Christian business owners should pay close attention. The Kleins had a choice. They could obey the government or they could obey God. They chose God – and now they must pay the price.”17
The Klein case is the sour fruit of the civil rights tree planted by the communist handlers of Martin Luther King Jr. It is only the beginning. The civil rights laws that are now being used to trample God-given rights could not have been passed without the disinformation that was part and parcel of the civil rights movement.
Endnotes
1 Francis X. Clines, Reagan’s Doubts on Dr. King Disclosed, The New York Times, October 23, 1983, http://www.nytimes.com/1983/10/22/us/reagan-s-doubts-on-dr-king-disclosed.html.
2 Marcus Epstein, Myths of Martin Luther King, January 18, 2003, https://www.lewrockwell.com/2003/01/marcus-epstein/myths-of-martin-luther-king/.
3 Jimmy T. (Gunny) LaBaume, When Judged by the Content of His Character, January 18, 2016 (citing Starrett, Mary, How a Marxist Came to be an American Hero, NewsWithViews.com January 16, 2004. Quoted within that article: King, A Critical Biography by David Lewis, Martin Luther King, The Man Behind The Myth, by Des Griffin and the National Observer, 1963.)
4 Labaume, supra.
5 Jimmy T. (Gunny) LaBaume, When Judged by the Content of His Character, January 18, 2016 (citing Steele, Edgar J., The Perfect American Holiday; Horne, Cadrmeron L., HAPPY BIRTHDAY, ROBERT E. LEE or Happy Birthday, Martin Luther King, Jr.?; Hoffman, Michael, 1992, Holiday for a Cheater, Wiswell Ruffin House, Dresden, New York; Montgomery, Victor M. Letter to the Editor. Greenville, NC newspaper of record.
6 Don Boys, Was MLK a Communist?, January 19, 2009, http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=928.
7 Don Boys, Was MLK a Communist?, January 19, 2009, http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=928.
8 Don Boys, Was MLK a Communist?, January 19, 2009, http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=928.
9 Don Boys, Was MLK a Communist?, January 19, 2009, http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=928.
10 Don Boys, Was MLK a Communist?, January 19, 2009, http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=928.
11 Did You Say Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Was a Phony?, http://frontline.org.za/index.php?option=com_content&id=1506:did-you-say-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-was-a-phony#sthash.9nFC0e2O.dpuf (last visited on May 15, 2016).
12 Did You Say Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Was a Phony?, http://frontline.org.za/index.php?option=com_content&id=1506:did-you-say-dr-martin-luther-king-jr-was-a-phony#sthash.9nFC0e2O.dpuf (last visited on May 15, 2016).
13 Don Boys, Was MLK a Communist?, January 19, 2009, http://www.conservativetruth.org/article.php?id=928.
14 Kevin Alfred Strom, The Beast as Saint: The Truth About Martin Luther King, Jr., http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/king_jr-exposed.htm (last visited on May 21, 2016).
15 Kevin Alfred Strom, The Beast as Saint: The Truth About Martin Luther King, Jr., http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Wolves/king_jr-exposed.htm (last visited on May 21, 2016).
16 Todd Starnes, Christian Bakers Fined $135,000 for Refusing to Make Wedding Cake for Lesbians, Fox News, July 3, 2015, http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2015/07/03/christian-bakers-fined-135000-for-refusing-to-make-wedding-cake-for-lesbians.html.
17 Todd Starnes, supra.
Communist Party USA Endorses MLK
It is not surprising, therefore, to find that to this day the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) heaps great praise and honor upon Martin Luther King Jr. The CPUSA states that “Dr. King understood that racial equality and economic injustice were incompatible, and that the fight for the rights of workers and the poor was a key part of building a movement for social transformation.” That social transformation advocated by both Dr. King and CPUSA is a communist social transformation, where a person’s individual God-given rights must give way to group rights.