AN HONEST JUDGE AND JURY WOULD NEED NO MORE THAN THIS

On Mon, Sep 12, 2022 at 11:31 AM FEPC <info@theflatearthpodcast.com> wrote:

Ed,  www.StopLookThink.com has all the 911 videos and everything else that YouTube deleted.

www.TheFlatEarthPodcast.com

Flat Earth Sun & Moon Clock app *NOW AVAILABLE* on Google Play and Apple.  Download it today and start flat smacking!

https://qrco.de/bbizVA

On Sep 12, 2022, 10:27 AM -0400, Edward Hendrie <edwardhendrie@gmail.com>, wrote:

The pictures below are frames from a BBC live broadcast on 9-11-01 that announces the collapse of WTC building 7 (also known as the Solomon Brothers Building). The announcer, Phil Hayton, had earlier told the audience that the Solomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) had collapsed (20 minutes before the actual collapse). Hayton repeats the announcement again at 5:07 p.m. EST. At approximately 5:07 p.m. EST, the newscaster states: “Now more on the latest building collapse in New York, you might have heard a few moments ago us talking about the Solomon Brothers Building collapsing, and indeed it has. . . . Jane what more can you tell us about the Solomon Brothers Building and its collapse?” The curious thing about the broadcast video is that the building did not collapse until 13 minutes later, at approximately 5:20 p.m. EST.

After the announcer tells the audience that Solomon Brothers Building (WTC 7) had collapsed, he goes to a live feed to Jane Standley on the scene in New York. Initially her head blocks WTC 7, but she later moves and shows the audience the smoke rising from towers 1 and 2. When she does that you can see WTC 7 clearly standing in the background. When she resumes her appearance on the screen you can see WTC 7 in the background over her left shoulder and to the left of her left ear.

Someone at the BBC jumped the gun and had the script read too early.  This is evidence that 9/11 was scripted in advance, and that the major media outlets were part of the conspiracy.

<Tower 7.png>

  Picture from Chapter 10 of 9/11 – Enemies Foreign and Domestic.

 

The BBC has received much attention and a lot of inquiries over their 9-11-2001 broadcast predicting the collapse of WTC Tower 7.  It took the BBC until February 27, 2007, to respond to the inquiries, by publishing a short response from Richard Porter.  Think about that.  This is a news organization that is supposed to be in the business of gathering news and rapidly disseminating an accurate account of events to the public.  It took them years to respond to inquiries about their prediction of the collapse of Tower 7.  That is the behavior that is consistent with someone who is not quite sure what to say and wants to take their time to ensure that they do not say anything that might later turn out to be incriminating.

The problem in which the BBC finds itself is that the circumstances of the pre-reporting on 9-11-2001 are so compellingly incriminating that no explanation will mitigate its guilt.  They have, so to speak, been caught red-handed.  The only thing that they can do is either admit guilt, which they are not going to do, or try to cover their tracks with lies, which is what they have done.  The BBC response is quite revealing and incriminating.  The most notable thing in its response is that the BBC simply makes assertions without any supporting evidence, as though a denial is sufficient.  The BBC stated:

We’re not part of a conspiracy. Nobody told us what to say or do on September 11th. We didn’t get told in advance that buildings were going to fall down. We didn’t receive press releases or scripts in advance of events happening.

The BBC states that they are not part of a conspiracy and that nobody told them in advance that the buildings would fall down on September 11th.  However, if they broadcast an event that nobody could possibly foresee, and then the event takes place exactly as they pre-reported, that clearly indicates that they had prior knowledge of the event.Their pre-reporting was more than a prediction of the event, it was a reporting of the event before it happened.  If the BBC had said that Tower 7 “would soon collapse” they would have some explaining to do.  People would want to know how they knew it was going to collapse.  However, the BBC did not say Tower 7 would “soon collapse;” the BBC announced that Tower 7 had already collapsed.  That is doubly suspicious, because it proves that they had a script about the collapse of Tower 7 and were reading from the script.  The BBC made a mistake by reading the script too early.

The BBC premature reporting of Tower 7’s collapse is more than a mere prediction of an event; it is a reporting of an unforeseeable event that actually occurred just as it was reported, but the report was aired before the unforeseeable event occurred.  The only way that could happen is if the BBC had a script of the planned events of 9-11-2001 ahead of time.  The only source for such a script had to be from the perpetrators.  That puts the BBC in the middle of the 9/11 conspiracy and cover-up. The BBC denial does not address that point at all.