More Bad News: The New Vaccines Disrupt Menstrual Cycles
It Turns Out Dr. Naomi Wolf Was Right!
Emerald Robinson
Jan 17
Comment
Share
Back in the summer of 2021, noted author Dr. Naomi Wolf was permanently banned from Twitter for the “misinformation” of wondering whether the new vaccines could affect women’s menstrual cycles. This was a lie, according to NPR (and a thousand other corporate media outlets) that merited the disappearance of any vaccine skeptic crazy enough to repeat the allegation. It was like claiming that the earth was flat in the 21st century: a denial of science so terrible that it called into question the sanity of the speaker. Various liberal publications even began to question whether Dr. Naomi Wolf had ever been liberal, or insightful, now that she was a confirmed anti-vaxxer.
Of course, it turns out that Dr. Naomi Wolf was correct. Hundreds of women have come forward in the last year claiming that their periods were disrupted. A study of these women has confirmed the disruption.
From the New York Times:
A study published on Thursday found that women’s menstrual cycles did indeed change following vaccination against the coronavirus. The authors reported that women who were inoculated had slightly longer menstrual cycles after receiving the vaccine than those who were not vaccinated.
Their periods themselves, which came almost a day later on average, were not prolonged, however, and the effect was transient, with cycle lengths bouncing back to normal within one or two months. For example, someone with a 28-day menstrual cycle that starts with seven days of bleeding would still begin with a seven-day period, but the cycle would last 29 days. The cycle ends when the next period starts and would revert to 28 days within a month or two.
Why would the vaccines affect a woman’s cycle at all? Nothing like this should be happening. This is yet more proof that we absolutely no idea what long-term issues we have created by mass vaccinating our population with experimental gene therapies on an emergency use basis. We are probably facing the largest and most serious public health policy catastrophe in the history of the world.
This awful news comes on the heels of more awful news regarding the experimental vaccines that was contained in the Project Veritas documents unearthed from DARPA. Those documents show that Dr. Fauci obviously perjured himself and pursued deadly “gain of function” research despite sustained safety concerns; that the U.S. military knew that the new vaccines were ineffective and that ivermectin and HCQ were effective but did nothing and said nothing during the most intense pro-vaccine media propaganda campaign in American history; and that U.S authorities knew that the spike protein in the new vaccines was so toxic that it would not sanction research of that spike protein in 2018.
We have injected that toxic spike protein into 200 million people in the United States alone. What are the long term effects of that policy decision? We are starting to see it — in the actuarial tables.
Both Dr. Robert Malone and Steve Kirsch have drawn attention on Substack to a story regarding the death rate in Indiana among people aged 18 – 64 originally published in Center Stage.
According to Scott Davison, the CEO of an insurance company in Indiana called OneAmerica: “We are seeing, right now, the highest death rates we have seen in the history of this business…”
“Just to give you an idea of how bad that is, a three-sigma or a one-in-200-year catastrophe would be 10% increase over pre-pandemic,” he said. “So 40% is just unheard of.”
See the video of CEO Scott Davison discussing the data here. The story has been picked up in other outlets recently. Other insurers have also reported similar increases.
People are beginning to die in large numbers — and that should not be happening. The vaccines obviously don’t work.
What else are they lying about?