The CDC Has Covered-Up its Own Vaccinated vs. Unvaccinated Study That Proved Vaccines Are Dangerous to Children
The CDC conducted a study that proved vaccines are dangerous to children. The CDC could not allow that information to get out. So, they hatched a plan to coverup the results of the study.
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
In November 2012, Dr. Coleen Boyle, the Director of the National Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, testified under oath before the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform that “we have not studied vaccinated versus unvaccinated [children].” Robert F. Kennedy Jr. states, “that was perjury.” Kennedy, through Freedom of Information requests, found out that, indeed, the CDC has done vaccinated vs. unvaccinated comparative health studies.
Kennedy discovered that in 1999, the CDC employed an in-house researcher, Thomas Verstraeten, to conduct a vaccinated vs. unvaccinated study using CDC’s giant Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD). The study evaluated whether cumulative ethylmercury exposure from thimerosal-containing vaccines after one month of life increased “the subsequent risk of degenerative and developmental neurologic disorders and renal disorders before the age of six.” The study results proved that vaccines were dangerous to the health of children. The study concluded that “high exposure to ethylmercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines in the first month of life increases the risk of subsequent development of neurologic development impairment.”
In particular, the study found that the relative risk of autism for vaccinated children was 7.6 times greater than the unvaccinated children. The study also found that the relative risk of sleep disorders for vaccinated children was 5 times greater than unvaccinated children. The study further found that the relative risk of speack disorders for vaccinated children was 2.1 times greater than unvaccinated children. The study found that the relative risk for neurological development disorders for vaccinated children was 1.8 times greater than unvaccinated children.
The CDC could not allow that information to get out. So they instituted a plan to coverup the results of the study. Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explains:
The world’s largest vaccine maker GSK whisked Verstraeten off to a sinecure in Brussels and CDC handed his raw data to his CDC boss Frank DeStefano and another researcher, Robert Davis who served as a vaccine industry consultant. Those two men tortured the data for 4 years, removing all unvaccinated children, to bury the autism signal before publishing a sanitized version purporting to exculpate the vaccine. The CDC then cut off public access to the VSD and to this day aggressively blocks any attempts by researchers to study health outcomes in vaccinated vs. unvaccinated populations.
The fraudulently altered study that ended up being published changed the actual conclusion in the original study from showing that “high exposure to ethylmercury from thimerosal-containing vaccines in the first month of life increases the risk of subsequent development of neurologic development impairment” to, instead, say that “[n]o consistent significant associations were found between TCVs [thimerosal-containing vaccines] and neurodevelopmental outcomes.”
Kennedy caught government health officials red-handed lying to Congress and engaging in fraud to conceal the dangers of childhood vaccines. This is not merely negligence or dereliction of duty; it is part of a well-funded conspiracy to injure and kill children. This is the behavior of sociopathic criminals. The childhood vaccine scheme constitutes organized crime that is more sophisticated and more dangerous than any mafia syndicate.
 |