IT’S TIME FOR A THOUSAND MORE “KENNESAWS” ~

In order for the younger readers to understand the headline above, we must backtrack in history for a moment to 1981 when another leftist town council in Illinois, Morton Grove, defied the U. S. Constitution’s Second Amendment by voting-in a local statute banning possession of all firearms of any type within the city limits. It was about as unconstitutional as any statute could get and would certainly be shot down by the courts down the road. However, in the meantime, the whole absurd idea raised the ire of Americans in every state and none quite so much as the Mayor of Kennesaw, Georgia, Darvin Purdy.

Mayor Purdy called an emergency meeting of the town council, and before the same week was out, Kennesaw, Georgia had done something totally off the chart: the council unanimously passed a new city ordinance requiring every household to possess a weapon. There was no ridiculous fine for not adhering to the ordinance, in fact, Purdy even said that no efforts would be taken to enforce the new statute, pointing out that it was more to defy the stupidity of the “Morons of Morton Grove.” Nevertheless, the Kennesaw citizens rallied behind their mayor and many (no record of the actual number) went out and purchased a weapon.

The following year, after the statistics were officially recorded, national radio commentator Paul Harvey reported on his popular noontime broadcast that the crime stats (especially home break-ins) in Kennesaw were but a fraction of the past while those of Morton Grove had soared.

Yes, indeed, it is time for a thousand more townships across the nation to adopt a “Darvin Purdy Ordinance” and maybe even name it after him.

TOWN BYPASSES CONSTITUTION, US CITIZENS GIVEN 60 DAYS TO TURN IN GUNS OR BECOME CRIMINALS

Published: April 5, 2018

SOURCE: JACK BURNS

As the state promises gun rights activists they’re not coming for their guns, behind the scenes they’re pleading for it to happen. And now the feared gun grab is occurring. Residents in Deerfield, Illinois have 60 days to surrender their “assault weapons” or face fines of $1000 per day per gun.

The gun ban ordinance was passed on April 2nd with residents left with few choices of how to dispose of their valuable “assault weapons.” Upon careful reading of the ordinance, residents will be left with revolvers, .22 caliber “plinking” rifles, and double barrel shotguns to defend their homes and families from criminals who could care less about the law.

Fines for not disposing of the weapons range from $250 to $1000 per day per gun for those who choose not to comply with the city’s ordinance. While a fine may seem reasonable to some, as TFTP has reported on multiple occasions, failure to pay fines always results in police action. It is not far-fetched to predict major turmoil and arrests in the event of non-compliance.

One example of the so-called “assault weapon” is the Ruger 10/22 which can accept magazines that hold more than 10 rounds. Even though the 10/22 is not listed in the list of guns the village wants to see banned, the gun cannot legally be possessed in the village.

Residents have been instructed to either sell their guns, transfer the ownership to someone who lives outside the village, surrender their guns to Deerfield’s sheriff, or begin paying the fines.

Deerfield mentioned a number of cities where mass shootings took place, including Sutherland Springs, TX where 26 people were killed in the First Baptist Church. That shooting was actually stopped by a man who used the very gun Deerfield voted to ban. No mention was made of that fact in the ordinance.

Also included in the gun ban were semi-automatic pistols which can accept higher than 10 round magazines. That’s virtually all full-size semi-automatic pistols.

Even though the village trustees ignored the pleas of residents to leave their guns alone, and passed the ordinance anyway, many residents were encouraged to ignore the gun ban and engage in civil disobedience.

Joel Siegel, a resident of Lincolnwood, warned the village’s residents that governments all across the world have moved to confiscate guns then turned around and ran roughshod over the people. He said, “There’s an ancient and honored American tradition called disobeying an unjust law…I have urged (people) to listen to their conscience and if so moved do not obey this law.”

Deerfield Mayor Harriet Rosenthal implied the students from the local high school helped sway her decision to bring about the ordinance. “Enough is enough,” Rosenthal said adding, “Those students are so articulate just like our students. There is no place here for assault weapons.”

The statement mirrors the knee-jerk reaction to ban guns following a nationwide public outcry of students who supposedly feared for their own lives following the recent mass shooting in Florida.

Opponents of the gun grab vow to fight the action in court while others praised the trustee’s decision to ban semiautomatic rifles, pistols and shotguns. Ariella Kharasch, a Deerfield High School senior said she wants more action to be taken on both a local and national level.

“This is our fight…This is our generation’s fight. We’re going to keep fighting and this is part of it. Change happens gradually step by step. The fight does not end at the borders of our village.,” Kharasch said.

Predictably, law enforcement and retired law enforcement members of the community are exempted from the ban. Currently, in the U.S., law enforcement kills around 1,200 citizens per year. Ironically, that number is actually four times higher than those who die from rifles.

As TFTP has reported, cops have killed 450 percent more people than have died in the past forty years of mass shootings.

Comment (1)

  1. Dick Bachert

    Back in the early 80s, I attended a speech by the late Arkady Shevchenko, then the highest-ranking Soviet official to defect to the West. He had been their top guy at the UN.

    He spoke, interestingly, at KENNESAW COLLEGE — and we all know what Kennesaw is famous for! I’m proud to have played a small role in helping Mayor Darvin Purdy get that legislation through the Kennesaw City Council.

    Shevchenko’s talk dealt with the clear intent of the leadership of the old Soviet Union (12/5/2015 UPDATE: ADD THE CURRENT LEFTIST CONTROLLED FEDERAL GOVERNMENT TO THAT LIST!) to somehow take America. He mentioned their ICBMs and the nuclear blackmail threat they posed. (12/5/2015 UPDATE: MAKE THAT THE MUSLIMS!)

    Then he broke from his prepared remarks and offered the audience this wisdom:

    “The leaders of my country are as AFRAID OF YOUR 200 MILLION (12/5/2015 UPDATE: MAKE THAT 380 MILLION AND COUNTING!) PRIVATE FIREARMS as they are of your ICBMs. NEVER GIVE UP YOUR GUNS.”

    Frankly — and, while he had to be careful as he was under FBI protection at the time, Shevchenko alluded to this in his remarks — I’m as concerned about some domestic tyrant (say, a Hillary, Nancy Pelosi, Barack HUSSEIN Obama or Chuck Schumer) as I am about some foreign enemy.

    And it is THAT threat about which the Founding Fathers were concerned that prompted them to leave us the Second Amendment.

    The BIG question is: WILL WE KEEP IT?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j73SsNFgBO4

Comments are closed.