WHO IS MORE DANGEROUS ~ THE LIAR OR THE BELIEVER?

History is replete with misinformation and disinformation, and while not quite Everything They Ever Told Us was a Lie (what a great title for a book!), just about everything of importance was and continues to be blown out of proportion or twisted away from reality. “We make war by deception” boasts the Mossad slogan. “It is not what is true that is important but what the people perceive to be true,” said Henry Kissinger.  “You can fool some of the people all of the time, and those are the ones you want to concentrate on,” said George W. Bush, apparently only half joking (judging from his later antics), speaking at a Gridiron Club dinner in Washington, D. C. in March of 2001.

Even though Yankees and Rebels had been killing by shooting at each other for more than a year, the politically correct cause for the War of Federal Aggression was not determined to be the “Abolition of Slavery” until September of 1862, when Frederick Douglas whispered it into Abe Lincoln’s ear ~ and now it is the real cause, just ask anybody. (Everything prior to that had revolved around the financial motivation: taxation without representation, the threat of New Orleans becoming the financial center instead of New York, and the over-taxation of the Southern states’ lucrative cotton profits. But none of these was a legitimate excuse for Lincoln’s war. The abolition of slavery was!)

Intelligent people still parrot the impossible extermination number of “Six Million” from 1945 (although the rumor didn’t start until 1961 with the Eichmann trial), and even with the many pictures of the starved bodies of German civilians thrown in as more evidence of victims of the “holocaust,” the absurdity of the alleged number was and is not lessened.

More than 2,200 professionals have joined Richard Gage’s “Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth,” with all of them, 100%, agreeing that steel-girded buildings cannot collapse at free-fall speed without demolition assistance. With that endeavor requiring weeks and even months of preparation, we have the smoking gun. Both Bush and Cheney refused to go under oath with their testimony, which should have made them “persons of interest” with any serious investigator. The Kean Commission, purportedly to investigate and give the American people the truth about the phony attacks on NYC and the Pentagon, could not explain why the 47-story WTC Building Seven suddenly dropped in its tracks some seven hours after the first two. Because no plane had hit Building Seven and the fact that there were only small fires in a few of its offices, there could be but one cause for the building to collapse in only seven seconds, but that cause had to remain unmentionable. When the commission released its report, it showed exactly what the government always shows when facts cannot be explained: nothing. That’s right. The Kean Commission decided not to address that issue at all, and no mention of the 47-story collapse can be found in its “investigative” report.

Such deception, half truths and blatant lies should be expected from government by every American citizen, but it is not what otherwise normally intuitive people grasp. Here is another example of how the news media was and is used (think Trump) to distort the truth and destroy a man’s character when he gets too close to the truth. Incidentally, I attended the final day of the Army/McCarthy hearings.

Pat Shannan

 

 ANOTHER BIG LIE UNCOVERED & EXPOSED

Joe McCarthy vs Joe Welch: What REALLY Happened?

By Mike King, Tomato Bubble.com

Whenever a man of true accomplishment ventures out beyond his field of expertise; he runs the risk of falling into the trap of superficiality and inserting his foot in his mouth. And so it is, once again, with the esteemed anti-Establishment economist and columnist/blogger, Paul Craig Roberts. After having twice been previously corrected by your favorite alternative historian here over erroneous statements regarding the meaning of ‘Deutschland Uber Alles’ (here), and the Soviet-German war within World War II (here) — Roberts has repeated a big lie about the late great anti-Communist Senator, Joseph McCarthy (R-WI).

 

So, with all love and due respect, it’s back to the woodshed we go.

 Dr. Roberts; this is going to hurt me more than it does you.

In his otherwise excellent column titled, ‘Putin Calls Out Washington’, Dr. Roberts, perhaps seeking to show the world that he is not such an “extremist”, briefly detours into la la land by making a weird analogy to the Army-McCarthy hearings of 1954. He writes:

“Putin’s question reminds me of the question Joseph Welch asked witch-hunting Senator Joseph McCarthy: “Have you no sense of decency?” Welch’s question is attributed with initiating the decline of McCarthy’s career.”

First and foremost, as long-since declassified U.S. Intelligence documents and long-since opened Soviet archives have completely confirmed; Joe McCarthy was not a “witch-hunter”. Indeed, even many liberal historians have had to readjust their positions regarding what we now know was a substantial penetration of the U.S. government by Communist subversives (originally aided and abetted by FDR) . The overall subject is too vast to adequately cover in this piece. Highly recommended and authoritative books on the matter are ‘The Venona Intercepts‘ by Eric Breindel; and ‘Blacklisted by History‘ by M. Stanton Evans.

 WOW! — and WOW! – is all we can say about these two well researched books that set the record straight about the shocking level of the Communist subversion of the 1940’s – 1950’s. “Witch-hunt” my a – -!

The specific event which we will focus on here is Roberts’ gross misinterpretation of Joe Welch‘s legendary, immortalized, and so bloody damn cliched retort to Joe McCarthy — “Have you no sense of decency, Sir?” 

Given Roberts’ reference to the hearings as a “witch-hunt”, we may logically infer that he is agreement with Welch’s theatric accusation that McCarthy was lacking in “decency”. But had Roberts taken the time to dig a bit deeper – to see the overall context of the event – he would have clearly seen that McCarthy’s questioning of Welch (Attorney for the Army) was neither out of order nor outside the boundaries of “decency”, at all! To the contrary, it was Welch who raised his voice, turned hostile and displayed “indecency.”

The Army–McCarthy hearings came about due to McCarthy’s allegations of Red penetration of the Army and the Army’s counterattacks upon McCarthy’s staff. Joseph Welch was a partner at Hale and Dorr, the Boston law firm hired to represent the Army.

Prior to the start of the hearings, Welch had tapped Fred Fisher as the junior attorney to assist him during the hearings. It was soon discovered that Fisher, while in Harvard Law school, had joined the National Lawyers Guild (NLG) – a Communist front organization if ever there was one! (here)

McCarthy was understandably suspicious over the fact that the Army’s chosen law firm tried to assign a Communist – or at least a Communist sympathizer / “fellow traveler” – to confront and confound a Senate Committee tasked with exposing Communists within the ranks of the very government which the Army is supposed to answer to. (Welch had to withdraw Fisher from the case.)

In a very calm and civil tone (video down below), McCarthy (an ex-Judge) questioned Welch about his Communist boy Fisher. That’s when the grand-standing Welch, animated and agitated, put on the self-righteous and aggressive victimization act which the press, court historians, and Hollywood have made so famous. 

1- Point of Order (1964) – Cherry-picked clips of the Army-McCarthy hearings include “Have you no sense of decency, Sir?”  2- Tail Gunner Joe (1977) Burgess Meredith played Joe Welch in a badly distorted TV movie about the Army-McCarthy hearings. — “Have you no sense of decency, Sir?” 

Welch accused McCarthy of “recklessness” and “cruelty” — accusations which stick to this day. But was Joe McCarthy really being “reckless” and “indecent” in his exchange with Attorney Welch? You decide!

***** 

Welch vs McCarthy

 

RELEVANT EXCERPT FROM THE EXCHANGE

McCarthy has asked Welch about Fred Fisher and his membership in the Communist NLG:

Welch: Until this moment, Senator, I think I have never really gauged your cruelty or your recklessness. Fred Fisher is a young man who went to the Harvard Law School and came into my firm and is starting what looks to be a brilliant career with us. Little did I dream you could be so reckless and so cruel as to do an injury to that lad. It is true he is still with Hale and Dorr. It is true that he will continue to be with Hale and Dorr. It is, I regret to say, equally true that I fear he shall always bear a scar needlessly inflicted by you. If it were in my power to forgive you for your reckless cruelty I would do so. I like to think I am a gentleman, but your forgiveness will have to come from someone other than me.

McCarthy: May I say that Mr. Welch talks about this being cruel and reckless. He was just baiting — he has been baiting Mr. Cohn (McCarthy’s legal assistant) for hours   —– now I just give this man’s (Fisher’s) record, and I want to say Mr. Welch, that is has been labeled long before he became a member (of Welch’s law firm), as early as 1944…

Welch: Senator, may we not drop this? We know he belonged to the Lawyers Guild. Let us not assassinate this lad further, Senator. You’ve done enough. Have you no sense of decency, sir? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?

McCarthy: Mr. Welch talks about any sense of decency. It seems that Mr. Welch is pained so deeply  — he thinks it is improper for me to give the record – the Communist front record – of a man whom he wanted to foist upon this committee. 

— Mr.Welch, if I have said anything here which is untrue, then tell me. I have heard you and everyone else talk so much about laying the truth on the table.

McCarthy then tries to ask Welch another question about Fisher. The combative Welch, invoking God, quickly interrupts:

Welch:  Mr. McCarthy, I will not discuss this further with you. You have sat within six feet of me and could have asked me about Fred Fisher. You have seen fit to bring it out. And if there is a God in Heaven it will do neither you nor your cause any good. I will not discuss it further. I will not ask Mr. Cohn any more questions. You, Mr. Chairman, may, if you will, call the next witness.

*****

Now, I ask you, Dr. Roberts, and dear reader — what was so “cruel” — what was so “indecent” about Senator McCarthy wanting to get to the bottom of the mystery of how and why a Communist lawyer was assigned to represent the U.S. Army during hearings indirectly related to the exposure of Stalin’s Red moles? (Stalin had only recently died.) One must admit — it is a bit troubling, no, mind-boggling, is it not? Why did Welch over-react and turn so defensive? Answer: Because he was busted – that’s why!

The following day, The New York Times, The Washington Post, and the rest of the Piranha Press followed “hero” Welch’s lead and denounced McCarthy for his “tactics”. Typical!

All throughout the Army-McCarthy hearings – which really scared the phony “anti-Communist” President / ex-General Eisenhower – the press smeared McCarthy and misrepresented all the testimonies.

On the other hand, Welch, the slick sophist and defender of Communists, was hyped up as a heroic fighter for freedom and human rights!

The Communist Fred Fisher went on to become a full partner at Welch’s Hale and Dorr. In 1973–74, he served as president of the Massachusetts Bar Association. In 1989, he died in Israel, (cough-cough) where he was lecturing.

Joseph Welch, that big-mouth drama queen with the nasty demeanor, became a living legend of the left — even playing a judge in the film Anatomy of a Murder (1959). His wife, Agnes, was also cast in the film, as a juror. He was nominated for a Golden Globe Award for Best Supporting Actor. Welch also narrated two television shows before his death in 1960. 

And what of the great, the good and the misunderstood Joseph McCarthy? President Eisenhower, working behind the scenes, eventually had the anti-Communist hearings killed and McCarthy censured by his Senate colleagues (prominent among them being Senator Prescott Bush – patriarch of that vile Bush Family Dynasty). The “disgraced” Senator McCarthy died of a very suspicious and sudden death (poison?) in 1957. He was just 48.

In terms of inducing pure revulsion and hatred, McCarthy’s name ranks second only to that of Adolf Hitler — which tells us all we need to know about both men! As the Roman poet-philosopher Ausonius once observed, “Truth is the mother of hatred.”

1- Eisenhower and Bush (and many others) plotted to destroy McCarthy before his investigations could reach up to the New World Order bosses who were ultimately behind the lower-level Communist penetration.

2- Acting in a film came naturally to a phony poser like Joe Welch.

3- “This must be the product of a great conspiracy, a conspiracy on a scale so immense as to dwarf any previous such venture in the history of man.” – Joe McCarthy

. 1- A libtard named Michael Leon urinates on the grave of Senator Joseph R. McCarthy in St. Mary’s Cemetery – Appleton, WI.  — a common practice among area Communists & Libtards. (here)

2- McCarthy’s Senate seat is held today by Commie-Pinko lesbian Tammy Baldwin.